Cases 81 - 90 of 8,015
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENITEZ-FLORES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS BENITEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayden v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02045
Petitioner:
Triniece Nathael Hayden
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Physique Dalton
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lozano-Bustos v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02036
Petitioner:
William Lozano-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hinton v. United States Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Charles E. Hinton
Respondent:
United States Incorporated, Roy A. Cooper, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Mattie Crystal Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
