Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Gordon v. Taylor et al
as 7:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Jenifer Gordon
Respondent:
Michael W. Taylor, Brian H. Turpin, Mary Kathryn Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spiker, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
George H. Spiker, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoover v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Malik Raheem Hoover
Defendant:
H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redmon v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00841
Petitioner:
John H. Redmon
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saffore v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Banita Brandise Saffore
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States Department Of Justice, M. Dzubak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham v. Quay
as 2:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
Jibri Cunningham
Respondent:
Warden H. Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00523
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Clarke
as 2:2021cv00553
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon et al v. Turpin et al
as 7:2021cv00509
Petitioner:
Shane Gordon and Jenifer Gordon
Respondent:
Judge Brian H. Turpin, Mary Pendleton and Sheriff Michael W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
