Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
JASON B. FORREST
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
Walter B White, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miksch v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00565
Petitioner:
John Miksch and John B Miksch
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01075
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
James B Hampton
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00281
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00934
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
