Cases 1 - 10 of 401
Berrocal v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Henry B. Berrocal
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04725
Petitioner:
Tyrone B Dixon
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkendoll v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00142
Petitioner:
Bobby B. Kirkendoll
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Berrocal v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center, et al.
as 5:2023cv01318
Petitioner:
Henry B Berrocal
Respondent:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Warden B. Rodriguez
as 6:2023cv00371
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Warden B. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rocha v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00848
Petitioner:
Jose B. Rocha
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Exum v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Stanley B. Exum
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Black v. Gonzales
as 4:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
J. B. Black
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv02357
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
B. Lumpkin, Jailers, R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Lamar et al
as 5:2022cv00725
Petitioner:
Ralph B. Torres, III
Respondent:
Susan Lamar and Lee Roy Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
