Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Houck v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
James E. Houck, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGill v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv03067
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. McGill, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Attorney General
Respondent:
Bohrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houck v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Petitioner:
James E. Houck
Respondent:
Warden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
William Wright
Respondent:
Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Robert E Cahill, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Petitioner:
Dwayne Larcel Brown
Respondent:
Robert E Cahill, Jr., Central Booking Warden, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis, Jr. v. Perkins
as 1:2022cv02542
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Clifton T. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Arthur Coleman
Defendant:
Christopher Smith and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin v. Werner et al
as 1:2022cv00395
Petitioner:
Taron Melvin
Respondent:
Warden Greg Werner and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Warden
as 1:2021cv03093
Petitioner:
Ernest E Taylor
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dame v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv03038
Petitioner:
Francois Nguessi Dame
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Smith and Attorney General Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
