Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Purcell #319445 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01455
Petitioner:
Donald Wade Purcell
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell #50575 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Robert Edward Powell
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Ryan F Thornell, Kris Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halterman #289633 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2023cv08615
Petitioner:
Jerad Lee Halterman
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv08568
Petitioner:
Edward F Parks
Respondent:
Mathew Smith, Mohave, County of, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv01748
Petitioner:
Marshawn F Phillips
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esposito v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00716
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Ralph F Esposito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibeabuchi v. Figueroa
as 2:2020cv02040
Respondent:
F Figueroa
Petitioner:
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morris v. Kelliher et al
as 4:2019cv00245
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and John F Kelliher, Jr.
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moreno v. McIntyre et al
as 4:2018cv00578
Respondent:
Doyle Johnstun, Trisha Driggs, Mike Powell and others
Petitioner:
Edgar Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parks v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv08084
Petitioner:
Edward F Parks
Respondent:
Charles Ryan, Richard Pratt and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
