Cases 1 - 10 of 99
White v. Director, TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Patrick A White, Sr
Respondent:
James V. Allred, Jr. (Prison) and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. James Allred
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens and others
Respondent:
James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullett v. Lilly et al
as 4:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Mullett
Respondent:
Veronical Lilly, V. Libby and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00526
Petitioner:
John Alfred Grimes, V
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joiner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Joseph V. Joiner
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delgado v. USA
as 4:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
Victor V. Delgado
Respondent:
USA and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kasali v. Bradley
as 4:2022cv04497
Petitioner:
Lola Shalewa Barbara Kasali
Respondent:
Warden Patricia V. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garay v. Board of Pardons and Parole
as 6:2022cv00783
Petitioner:
Andres V Garay
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00023
Defendant:
Santos V. Hernandez and David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden, FCI Bastrop
as 1:2021cv00957
Petitioner:
Willie V. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Bastrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
