Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Cartwright v. Watwood
as 3:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
Anthony Cartwright
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Anthony Lacy
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forney v. Sexton
as 2:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Forney
Respondent:
Keith Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv02756
Petitioner:
Charles Alvin Eason
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Anthony Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marion v. Bowers
as 2:2022cv02507
Petitioner:
Anthony Domontay Marion
Respondent:
FCI Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lacy v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
as 2:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Lacy
Respondent:
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibrihim v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Board
as 2:2022cv02172
Petitioner:
Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
Brett Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Alexander
as 2:2022cv02029
Petitioner:
Eddie Warner
Respondent:
Anthony C. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marion v. Warden FCI Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02578
Petitioner:
Anthony Domontay Marion
Respondent:
Warden FCI Memphis and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
