General Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
DUNN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00191
Petitioner: ADRIAN L. DUNN, SR.
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MASCHO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00241
Petitioner: ADRIAN MASCHO
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALTON v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00133
Petitioner: ADRIAN WALTON
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swift v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00180
Petitioner: Adrian Swift
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00697
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Adrian Hines
Not Classified By Court: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hines v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00489
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Adrian Hines
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01641
Petitioner: ADRIAN EDWARDS
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BENNETT v. LAYTON
as 1:2018cv01197
Petitioner: ADRIAN BENNETT
Respondent: NORMAN CHAFFINS and JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VASQUEZ v. KREUGER
as 2:2017cv00498
Respondent: J. E. KREUGER
Petitioner: ADRIAN J. VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Austin v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00070
Petitioner: Adrian Austin
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?