Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Doyle v. Coyne-Fague
as 22-1868
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL E. DOYLE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections for the state of Rhode Island and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Doyle v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00479
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Doyle, Jr.
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomes v. Wall
as 1:2019cv00620
Defendant:
A.T. Wall
Petitioner:
Duane Gomes
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shelton v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00607
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Alonzo Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. RI Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv00566
Defendant:
RI Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Randy J. Anderson
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00452
Petitioner:
Charles Newton
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miguel v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00422
Petitioner:
John S. Miguel
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reyes v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00334
Petitioner:
Pedro Reyes
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pope v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00076
Petitioner:
David W. Pope
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitaker v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2019cv00051
Petitioner:
KENDALL WHITAKER
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.