Cases 1 - 10 of 535
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent:
DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Terrance Brown and Terrance A Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Grant County Prosecutor Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brown and Lloyd Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Service List
Respondent:
Grant County Prosecutor Agency, Grant County Probation Agency, Marion, Indiana City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
Juvan Brown and Juvan James Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00426
Petitioner:
Terrance Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEWGENT v. BROWN
as 1:2023cv02092
Petitioner:
BIANCA NEWGENT
Respondent:
LASHELLE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00914
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Brown and Christopher Brown
Respondent:
Warden Mark R. Sevier and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
