Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BEAL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BEAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, RICHARD BOWER and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF PENNSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haight v. Harry et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow and others
Petitioner:
William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDIVNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00433
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and RICHARD BOWER
Petitioner:
JAMES W. VANDIVNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nottingham et al v. Harry et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Respondent:
Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow, Anthony Ciuca and others
Petitioner:
James E. Nottingham and William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DILLINGER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01491
Petitioner:
JOSEPH R. DILLINGER
Respondent:
RICHARD BOWER, ROBERT GILMORE and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWERS v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00254
Petitioner:
MARQUISE J. BOWERS
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOWERS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2013cv05550
Petitioner:
MALIK BOWERS
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWERS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00432
Petitioner:
MALIK BOWERS and MALIK BOWERS
Respondent:
DAVID D. DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruden v. Medical Directors et al
as 3:2008cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Medical Directors, Nolan, Cresson Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
