Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hyman-Bozeman v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv04844
Petitioner:
Kingston Cornelius Hyman-Bozeman
Respondent:
Governor Brian Kemp, Mayor Adrian Dickerson, Sheriff Victor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone et al v. Kemp et al
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Eddie Byrd and others
Respondent:
Brian Kemp, Jimmy S Smith and Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diarra v. Kemp
as 1:2021cv03902
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
Hon. Brian Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diarra v. Kemp
as 1:2021cv00816
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
Brian Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bergeron v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv06767
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Diane Davis et al
as 2:2021cv06340
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REDFORD v. Smith
as 1:2019cv03881
Respondent:
Nathan Deal and Hon. Brian Kemp
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Defendant:
Warden Tarmarshe Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REDFORD v. DEAL et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Respondent:
NATHAN DEAL and GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bill Kemp v. Billy Mitchem
as 10-11386
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KEMP
Respondent - Appellee:
BILLY MITCHEM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
