General Cases filed in South Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Bryan v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv02907
Petitioner: T Terell Bryan
Respondent: Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover v. Cohen
as 4:2024cv02635
Petitioner: David Glover
Respondent: Warden Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayers v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv01240
Petitioner: Breon Jacoby Mayers
Respondent: Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fishburne v. Lavern Cohen
as 0:2024cv01210
Petitioner: Derrick Fishburne
Respondent: Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Cohen
as 4:2024cv00963
Petitioner: Joseph Elijah Mills
Respondent: Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wills v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv00708
Petitioner: Theodore Wills
Respondent: Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Petitioner: Troy Darnell Hunter
Respondent: Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chestnut v. Cohens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02064
Petitioner: Armando K. Chestnut and Armando Chestnut
Respondent: Warden Cohens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ponder v. Cohen
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner: Bobby Ponder
Respondent: Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel v. Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01447
Petitioner: Lucius Simuel
Respondent: Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?