Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nunez v. Maricopa County Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv01939
Petitioner:
Frank Nunez
Respondent:
Maricopa County Attorney, Arizona, State of, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv00882
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Judicial Department of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felix v. Pima County Superior Court et al
as 4:2021cv00080
Respondent:
Pima County Superior Court, Pima County Attorney's Office, David Shinn and others
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Reyes Felix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy-Richardson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01493
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson, Ismael Murphy, Ismael A Richardson and others
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharma v. Maricopa County Attorney General
as 2:2020cv00432
Petitioner:
Peter Mohammed Sharma
Respondent:
Maricopa County Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leon v. Merchant et al
as 2:2015cv00599
Petitioner:
Lazaro Francisco Marrero Leon
Respondent:
Pinal County Attorney's Office, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv01050
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Attorney's Office
Petitioner:
Jamonz Majerrious Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mansanares v. Holding et al
as 2:2008mc00100
Petitioner:
Randall Mansanares
Respondent:
Steven Holding, Andrew P Thomas, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
