General Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 282
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner: David O'Neil
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SEWELL v. BOP
as 1:2024cv00472
Petitioner: DAVID ERIC SEWELL
Respondent: BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner: Ruben Fuller
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner: Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent: David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner: William Brian Mulder
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simpler v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02071
Petitioner: Jimmy Edward Simpler
Respondent: David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner: Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent: Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eads v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02031
Petitioner: Christopher J. Eads
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02014
Petitioner: David Keandre Dixon
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dunston v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02009
Petitioner: Equan Cornelius Dunston
Respondent: David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?