Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Barry v. NC Dept of Public Safety
as 1:2021cv00307
Petitioner:
Demetrius Sarratt Barry
Respondent:
NC Dept of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMPSON v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2020cv01110
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Petitioner:
WINFRED SCOTT SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belcher v. N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
as 1:2019cv00243
Respondent:
N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
Petitioner:
Michael W. Belcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARY v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2015cv00551
Petitioner:
ELIJAH SHANE CLARY
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LATTIMORE v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2014cv00721
Petitioner:
DON LATTIMORE
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY and W. DAVID GUICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAGAN v. YOUNG
as 1:2013cv00009
Petitioner:
TRAVIS PAGAN
Respondent:
REUBAN YOUNG and N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARCIA-IBARRA v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2012cv01259
Petitioner:
ISMAEL A. GARCIA-IBARRA
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARCIA-IBARRA v. N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2012cv01194
Petitioner:
ISMAEL A. GARCIA-IBARRA
Respondent:
N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYLES v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv01107
Petitioner:
HILDRED MANUEL LYLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
as 5:2012hc02134
Petitioner:
Gregory Lynn Gordon
Respondent:
N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
