Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wood v. FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Wesley Wood
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lafond v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00718
Petitioner:
Juvonta Lafond
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Brown, Warden et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Ruben Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Brown, Warden and FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Steelman v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Steelman
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Jason Walker
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reynolds v. Warden, FCI Beckley
as 5:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
Donald Reynolds
Respondent:
DSCC, FCI Beckley, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
