Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodley v. (lnu)
as 5:2024cv03053
Petitioner:
Alphonso Woodley
Respondent:
(fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beck v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Patrick Beck
Respondent:
FNU LNU, US Marshals and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gutierrez Reed et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Hanna Gutierrez Reed, Alec Baldwin and Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, FNU LNU and Michelle L. Grisham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
May v. New Mexico Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Andrew Nicholas May
Respondent:
New Mexico Attorney General and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Quinton Sanchez
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. LNU
as 5:2023cv01135
Petitioner:
Patrick Rodriguez
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sykes v. Starky, et al.
as 4:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
James Elwyn Sykes
Defendant:
Sheriff Deputy Starky, Jail Guard Farley, Corporal T. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. LNU 5:23-CV-221
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Salazar
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:23-CV-221 and Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fiorito v. LNU
as 5:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
