General Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MASON JR v. WARDON
as 1:2023cv00684
Petitioner: FLOYD M MASON JR
Respondent: WARDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00103
Petitioner: FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent: DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TRUELOVE v. COMMANDER
as 4:2016cv00168
Respondent: COMMANDER and FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner: DOMINIC TRUELOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARR v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01461
Petitioner: FLOYD CARR
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHASTAIN v. LAWRENCE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00258
Petitioner: FLOYD M. CHASTAIN
Respondent: D. LAWRENCE and U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FERRELL v. FLOYD SUPERIOR COURT #1
as 4:2010cv00070
Petitioner: TYLER S. FERRELL
Respondent: FLOYD SUPERIOR COURT #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLOYD v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2009cv00123
Petitioner: GLEN EDWARD FLOYD, JR
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00388
Petitioner: Glen Edward Floyd, Jr
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cockrell v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00431
Petitioner: Floyd L Cockrell
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carr v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00323
Petitioner: Floyd Carr
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?