Cases 1 - 10 of 24
William Smith v. Willie Eagleton
as 12-6385
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROSCOE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden
Respondent:
HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General
Akbar v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 0:2010cv01759
Petitioner:
Basil W Akbar
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of, Henry D McMaster and Daniel E Shearouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Whetstone v. Warden of Perry Correctional
as 10-6808
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD OWENS WHETSTONE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and HENRY D. MCMASTER
Preston Johnson v. Michael McCall
as 10-6756
Petitioner - Appellant:
PRESTON D. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL and HENRY D. MCMASTER
Darriel Cobbs v. Michael McCall
as 10-6499
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRIEL LEE COBBS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution and HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina
Ronnie Harris v. Michael McCall
as 09-8047
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNIE HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL
Respondent - None:
HENRY D. MCMASTER
McGraw v. McCall et al
as 2:2009cv02787
Petitioner:
Kenneth D McGraw
Respondent:
Michael McCall and Henry D McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. McMasters et al
as 3:2009cv01681
Petitioner:
Donald Gay
Respondent:
Henry D McMasters, Mark Sanford and Warden Padula
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. McCall et al
as 3:2009cv00948
Petitioner:
Ronnie Harris
Respondent:
Michael McCall and Henry D McMaster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobbs v. McCall et al
as 6:2009cv00528
Respondent:
Michael McCall and Henry D McMaster
Petitioner:
Darriel Lee Cobbs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
