Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robert Koon v. Colie Rushton
as 14-7022
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON
Respondent - Appellee:
COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
John Baccus v. Stan Burtt
as 11-7101
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Respondent - Appellee:
STAN BURTT, Warden and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General
Hughes v. McMasters
as 2:2010cv01136
Petitioner:
James Clarence Hughes, III
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMasters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Floyd v. McMaster
as 9:2010cv00077
Petitioner:
Jamells E Floyd
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sammie Stroman v. Henry McMaster
as 09-7834
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMMIE STROMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER and BERNARD MCKIE, Warden of Kirkland Correctional Institution
Johnnie Gathers v. Willie Eagleton
as 09-7533
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNIE GATHERS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER
Keith Graham v. Henry McMaster
as 09-7291
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH BRADLEY GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina and WARDEN LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Pipkin v. McMaster
as 3:2009cv01803
Petitioner:
Richard Shawn Pipkin
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickett v. McMaster et al
as 4:2009cv01481
Petitioner:
Ernest Eugene Pickett
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster and Ashley A McMahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. McMaster
as 2:2008cv03603
Petitioner:
Keith Bradley Graham
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
