Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Mitchell v. McMaster et al
as 9:2023cv06604
Petitioner:
Bennie Mitchell
Respondent:
Henry McMaster and Warden Stephen Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banshee v. McMaster et al
as 6:2021cv02602
Petitioner:
Mansa M Y Banshee
Respondent:
Henry McMaster, Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole Pardon Services The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Martell et al
as 9:2021cv02121
Petitioner:
Bennie Mitchell
Respondent:
Wilfredo Martell, Henry McMaster and Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stukes v. McMasters
as 0:2019cv03087
Respondent:
Henry McMasters and Warden
Petitioner:
Dantae Raheeve Stukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. McMaster
as 8:2018cv02841
Respondent:
Henry McMaster and Warden of Perry Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Ronald Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odom v. Cannon et al
as 5:2017cv02487
Petitioner:
Christopher Odom
Respondent:
Al Cannon, Chief Beatty, Stephanie Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Louis Fuller v. Leroy Cartlidge
as 14-6443
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS ENGLISH FULLER
Respondent - Appellee:
LEROY CARTLIDGE, Warden MCCI
Respondent:
HENRY MCMASTER, AG
Bernard McFadden v. State of South Carolina
as 13-7009
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD MCFADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and HENRY MCMASTER, South Carolina Attorney General
Bernard McFadden v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional
as 12-7618
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD MCFADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and HENRY MCMASTER, South Carolina Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
