Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beck v. Doe 4:23-cv-1181-O
as 4:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
Patrick Beck
Defendant:
John Doe 4:23-cv-1181-O
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lundahl v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Collette Peters, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luevano v. Abbott et al
as 1:2021cv01044
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
Greg Abbott, John Does, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trejo v. Salazar et al
as 5:2021cv00209
Respondent:
John Doe, Sheriff Javier Salazar and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00042
Respondent:
Jane Doe, FNU Lopez, B Wallace and others
Petitioner:
Ricardo A Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2020cv03375
Respondent:
John Doe, Director, TDCJ-CID and Pardons and Paroles Board Members
Petitioner:
Charles Larry Hunnicutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nabaya v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv02849
Respondent:
Jane Doe Braham, John Doe Perez and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Shapat Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Knize et al
as 3:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
R Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Gene Knize, Robert Davis and John Doe's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parks v. FCC Mailroom Staff et al
as 1:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Defendant:
FCC Mailroom Staff and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
