Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Jones #347223 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Petitioner:
LC Jones, III
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv02182
Petitioner:
Cordell Glen Jones
Respondent:
Unknown Party and Unknown Hanzen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Shinn
as 2:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
Dennis Jones
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dee Jones v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Darrick Dee Jones
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elem #086747 v. Ducey et al
as 4:2020cv00424
Respondent:
Unknown McCullan, Unknown Buchholz, Teresa Leonard and others
Petitioner:
Henry Elem, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fears #294690 v. Jones
as 2:2020cv01733
Petitioner:
Christian Dior Lovett Fears
Respondent:
Frankie Y Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Shinn
as 2:2020cv01220
Petitioner:
Charles Jones
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00526
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Jay Randall Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05505
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Dennis Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones #076408 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05258
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Craig Murray Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
