Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cordova v. Gay et al
as 1:2019cv00790
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and John Gay
Petitioner:
MacArthur Ray Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Gay et al
as 2:2019cv00202
Petitioner:
Alberto J Ramirez
Respondent:
John Gay and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GAY v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL
as 3:2019cv00063
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
JOHN GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gay v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00054
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
John Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armendariz v. Moya et al
as 1:2018cv01144
Respondent:
Attorney General State of New Mexico, Stanley Moya, State of New Mexico and others
Petitioner:
Michael Armendariz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Sanchez v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 14-15219
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND CARRION SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, JOHN GAY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Amis v. Ryan et al
as 3:2013cv08060
Petitioner:
Richard Wiley Amis, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, John Gay and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Ryan et al
as 3:2012cv08195
Petitioner:
Raymond Carrion Sanchez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, John Gay and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ian Branham v. John Gay, et al
as 11-18061
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN THOMAS BRANHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN GAY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Branham v. Gay et al
as 2:2010cv00501
Petitioner:
Ian Thomas Branham
Respondent:
John Gay and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
