Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woods v. Ozmint
as 9:2010cv02726
Petitioner:
Derrick Benard Woods
Respondent:
John Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latimer v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00721
Petitioner:
Randall Edwin Latimer
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and John Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Ozmint
as 0:2010cv00695
Petitioner:
Matthew T Brown, Sr
Respondent:
John Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earley v. Ozmint
as 4:2008cv03961
Petitioner:
Steven Roy Earley, Jr
Respondent:
John Ozmint
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gray v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2008cv03773
Petitioner:
Patrick Zane Gray
Respondent:
John Ozmint and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Ozmint
as 8:2008cv02036
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Moore
Respondent:
John Ozmint
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibbie v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv00142
Petitioner:
Daniel Elijah Gibbie
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Ozmint and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Ozmint
as 3:2007cv00923
Petitioner:
Saul Williams
Respondent:
John Ozmint and John Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKanic v. Ozmint
as 9:2007cv00800
Petitioner:
Elson McKanic
Respondent:
John Ozmint and Warden of Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. State of South Carolina et al
as 3:2007cv00739
Petitioner:
Kelly Lacey Roberts
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Atty Genaral of South Carolina, Cherokee County, Sheriff of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
