Cases 1 - 10 of 117
O'Donnell v. Lamas et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
KELLEY O'DONNELL
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF (PENNSYLVANIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'Donnell v. Lamas et al
as 4:2021cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelley O'Donnell
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas, The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARCHY v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2018cv05447
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
MARCUS ARCHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2018cv05443
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAHMAL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHORT v. LAMAS
as 2:2018cv03550
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS
Petitioner:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CORBIN v. LAMAS
as 2:2015cv00536
Petitioner:
JOHN L. CORBIN
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOUDY v. LAMAS
as 2:2014cv00156
Petitioner:
MOZELLE GOUDY
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Petitioner:
JAMES MILLER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weaver v. Lamas et al
as 3:2014cv00040
Petitioner:
Mark Alan Weaver
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDERSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv07667
Petitioner:
KEITH ANDERSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
