Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matthews v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Micah Sherif Matthews
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Trip
as 4:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
Micah Sherif Matthews
Respondent:
Chris Trip
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ankeny v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv03040
Petitioner:
Matthew Ankeny
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthews v. Johnson
as 3:2020cv03029
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Respondent:
Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthews v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 3:2020cv03025
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guzman Mendez v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv00381
Petitioner:
Lucio Arturo Guzman Mendez
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Department of, Matthew Ablence, John Asmussen and others
Respondent:
Chad Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eliff v. Lane
as 4:2019cv00363
Petitioner:
Kyle Matthew Eliff
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Respondent:
Tim Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Matthews v. Wachtendorf
as 4:2017cv00386
Petitioner:
Micah Sherif Matthews
Respondent:
Patti Wachtendorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. Pottawattamie County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2011cv00143
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
Pottawattamie County Sheriffs Dept., Matthew Wilbur, Stu Delacastro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
