Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cantu v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Petitioner:
Oziel Cantu
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T.D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fields v. Bower et al
as 2:2023cv02336
Petitioner:
Winfred Fields
Respondent:
F. J. Bower, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. CLARK
as 1:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
WAYNE N. SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2012cv01322
Plaintiff:
Dale N. Smith
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and United States Pre-Trial and Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2010cv22794
Plaintiff:
Datoral N. Smith
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Ryan et al
as 1:2010cv00108
Petitioner:
Ambria N. Smith
Respondent:
Patrick Ryan and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv04568
Petitioner:
TYRONE N. SMITH
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
