Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wymer v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv00689
Defendant:
Atlanta Police and Paul Howard
Plaintiff:
James Wymer
Respondent:
Sheriff Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spence v. State of Georgia, ex rel. et al
as 1:2018cv05003
Respondent:
State of Georgia, ex rel. and District Attorney Paul Howard
Petitioner:
Jermaine E. Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Department of Behavorial Health et al
as 1:2014cv04146
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Department of Behavorial Health, Georgia Regional Hospital, Annette Garvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Terry v. Jackson et al
as 1:2014cv01985
Petitioner:
Matthew Terry
Respondent:
Theodore Jackson
Defendant:
Cheryl Vortice, Paul Howard, Jr., Cathleen Tina Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Creswell v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv00720
Petitioner:
Brian Darcy Creswell, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Owens, Donald Barrow, Ron Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darryl J Smith v. Linda T McGrew et al
as 2:2013cv00245
Respondent:
Paul Howard, Linda T McGrew and U S Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Darryl J Smith
Barry Martin v. USA, et al
as 12-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barry Bernard Martin
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, United States Marshals Service and others
Paul Deering v. MDOC
as 12-1423
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL HOWARD DEERING
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Howard v. De Camp
as 3:2012cv00388
Respondent:
Joe De Camp
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Clifford Paul Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
BARRY BERNARD MARTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ERIC HOLDER, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
