Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cabello v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00027
Petitioner:
Archie Cabello
Respondent:
Regional Director Tellez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sinno v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00206
Respondent:
The State of Texas, Bobby Lumpkin, Hon. Stephanie R. Boyd and others
Petitioner:
Mohamad F. Sinno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pronin v. Penry et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Defendant:
FNU Halzapfel, Frank Lara, FNU Tenner and others
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Baynard v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2015mc00464
Plaintiff:
Cling Mark Baynard
Defendant:
Mr. Stephens, Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luevano v. Abbott et al
as 1:2015cv00092
Respondent:
Gov. Greg Abbott, Grivances Ladies, O.I.G. and others
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mauldin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00563
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mauldin v. Warden FCI-Low Beaumont et al
as 1:2013cv00503
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Low Beaumont, Bureau of Prisons, General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Regional Director USP Beaumont
as 1:2013cv00482
Petitioner:
Quawntay Adams
Respondent:
Regional Director USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
De La Hoya v. Bureau of Prisons Director et al
as 5:2013cv00003
Petitioner:
Gilberto De La Hoya
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons Director and South Central Region Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mauldin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00267
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
