Cases 1 - 10 of 42
TARASI v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2013cv00163
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY TARASI
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester Eiland v. Randall Britton, et al
as 12-4385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER EILAND
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Paul v. Britton, et al
as 12-3659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXIS A. PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDAL E. BRITTON, Superintendent SCI-Houtzdale, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY SCHUYLKILL COUNTY
Reinaldo Fantauzzi v. Randall Britton, et al
as 11-4623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REINALDO FANTAUZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, DA NORTHAMPTON and ATTY GEN PA
Vincent Thomas v. PA Bd of Probation & Parole, et al
as 10-3986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA BD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, ATTY GEN PA, RANDALL E. BRITTON, Superintendent and others
Jack Allen v. Muhammad Naji, et al
as 10-3953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MUHAMMAD NAJI, Dr., MANDY VARNER, PAC, MARIA LEAHY, PAC and others
Barry Shelley v. Randall Britton, et al
as 10-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY E. SHELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, Superintendent, ATTY GEN PA and DA SOMERSET
Luis Rodriguez v. Randall Britton, et al
as 10-2425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS ANDRES RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, ET AL, DA BERKS and ATTY GEN PA
Lester Eiland v. Randall Britton, et al
as 10-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER EILAND
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, ATTY GEN PA and DA DAUPHIN
Shawn Tomlin v. Randall Britton, et al
as 10-2086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN TOMLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, ET AL., DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
