General Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Nixon v. Pearl River County
as 1:2020cv00172
Plaintiff: Melvin Nixon, Jr.
Defendant: Pearl River County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nixon v. Pearl River County
as 3:2020cv00091
Petitioner: Melvin Nixon, Jr.
Respondent: Pearl River County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00914
Plaintiff: Reginald Williams
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haggard v. Rivers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00878
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Derrick T. Haggard
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Horton v. Rivers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00849
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Charles Horton
Defendant: Warden Christopher Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Defendant: Interim Assistant Thomas R. Kane, Attorney General William Barr, Interim Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Landron-Class v. Rivers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00778
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Landron-Class
Defendant: Warden Christopher Rivers and Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00748
Plaintiff: Johnnell A. Smith, Sr.
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00749
Plaintiff: Johnnell Smith, Sr.
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00750
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Johnnell A Smith
Respondent: C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?