Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Russell v. Commissioner, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Petitioner:
Mark Russell
Respondent:
Commissioner, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nivens v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2020cv01909
Respondent:
Warden Richard Dovey and Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Petitioner:
Stephen Nivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott-Bey v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv00781
Respondent:
State of Maryland, Richard Dovey, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and others
Petitioner:
Andre Jerome Elliott-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faulkner v. United States Marshal Services
as 1:2020cv00453
Respondent:
United States Marshal Services
Petitioner:
Alvin Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilder v. Moyer et al
as 8:2016cv00295
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.
Respondent:
Stephen T. Moyer and MD Public Safety & Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Secretary of Public Safety et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Petitioner:
Marvin Powell
Respondent:
Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
as 1:2012cv02216
Petitioner:
David Garnell Price, Jr
Respondent:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fauconier v. Director of the Department of Public Saftey and Correctional Services. et al
as 8:2011cv01966
Petitioner:
Douglas Fauconier
Respondent:
Director of the Department of Public Saftey and Correctional Services. and Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
