Cases 1 - 10 of 20
McKinney v. Snohomish County Corrections
as 2:2022cv01089
Petitioner:
Ethan Sheppard McKinney and Ethan Sheppard Smith
Respondent:
Snohomish County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Palmer v. Snohomish County Jail
as 2:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
James Dion Palmer
Respondent:
Snohomish County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brisbois v. Tulalip Tribal Court et al
as 2:2018cv01677
Respondent:
Snohomish County Jail, Tulalip Tribal Court and Tony Aston
Petitioner:
Tyrone Grant Brisbois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Said Farzad v. Snohomish County Superior Cour, et al
as 18-35465
Petitioner - Appellee:
SAID FARZAD
Respondent - Appellant:
SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and MARK ROE, Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney
Farzad v. Snohomish County Superior Court et al
as 2:2017cv01805
Petitioner:
Said Farzad
Respondent:
Snohomish County Superior Court, Robert W Ferguson and Mark Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watters v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Petitioner:
Dennis Richard Watters
Defendant:
Snohomish County and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cloud v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00983
Petitioner:
Edward Cloud
Respondent:
State of Washington and Snohomish County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cloud v. Snohomish County Jail
as 2:2016cv01046
Petitioner:
Edward E Cloud
Respondent:
Snohomish County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brock v. Snohomish County Superior Court
as 2:2014cv00373
Petitioner:
Louis W Brock
Respondent:
Snohomish County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hohf v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2014cv00295
Petitioner:
Russell Carl Hohf
Respondent:
State of Washington, Snohomish County Proscutor and Kathleen Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
