Cases 1 - 10 of 12
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love, Rashaud Hussein Azar El and Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussem Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs, Angel Gonzalez and others
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SHAW et al v. USA
as 1:2018cv00252
Petitioner:
MARSHALL TRISTAN SHAW and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaw v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2017hc02185
Petitioner:
Eric L. Shaw
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent and Sampson County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaw v. Perry
as 5:2016hc02267
Petitioner:
John Curtis Shaw
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOGER v. COUNTY CABARRUS et al
as 1:2016cv01192
Petitioner:
DERRICK D. BOGER
Respondent:
COUNTY CABARRUS, K. R. MYERS, V. W. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Joyner et al
as 5:2015hc02174
Petitioner:
Xavier Hosea Shaw
Respondent:
Carlton Joyner and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Middle District of Tennessee
as 5:2014hc02033
Petitioner:
James L. Shaw, III
Respondent:
Middle District of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaw v. United States Of America
as 5:2010hc02050
Petitioner:
Stanleigh Shaw
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
