General Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Mapes v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00560
Petitioner: Charles Russell Mapes
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Renee T Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roukis v. United States Army Corrections Command
as 4:2022cv00133
Petitioner: Peter T Roukis
Respondent: United States Army Corrections Command
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charleston v. Lothrop We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01835
Petitioner: Phillip T Charleston
Respondent: William W Lothrop and Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eldridge v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2021cv00081
Respondent: Patricia K Cushwa and Barbara Von Blanckensee
Petitioner: Clinton T Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eldridge v. Segal
as 4:2020cv00523
Petitioner: Clinton T. Eldridge and Clinton T Eldridge
Respondent: Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kogianes et al v. Jensen et al
as 2:2020cv02186
Respondent: Mark Brnovich and Edward Jensen
Petitioner: Michael George Kogianes and Cecil T Kinkade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gray v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01833
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Demoore T Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2020cv01499
Plaintiff: Demoore T Gray
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grimes v. Penzone We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01098
Petitioner: Charles T Grimes
Respondent: Paul Penzone, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charleston v. Lothrop We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00878
Respondent: William W Lothrop
Petitioner: Phillip T Charleston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?