Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Pate v. Haney et al.
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
William Glen Pate, Jr
Defendant:
Sarah Haney and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Lopez vs. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05179
Plaintiff:
William Murial Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Boswell v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
William J Boswell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Brigette D Williams
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gray v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Edward Gray
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Ball et al
as 4:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Todd Ball, James Gibson, Brandon C Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
