Cases 1 - 10 of 4,367
Coppola v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Coppola and Iron Thunderhorse
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 7:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Tracey Beltz, Sara Hennessey and Janett Kindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
William Hal McCarley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Darrell Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Williams and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Risby v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv02799
Petitioner:
William Morris Risby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
West v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02717
Petitioner:
John William West
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03977
Petitioner:
Delarick William Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Osborne
as 3:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank D. Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
