Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Joseph v. Greene
as 3:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
St. Remy v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Julien Michel St. Remy
Respondent:
Warden F. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MASON et al v. PENNYMAC MORTGAGE, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv05020
Respondent:
DEBRA HUNTER, POLAHA MATTHES, PENNYMAC MORTGAGE, LLC. and others
Petitioner:
FLORENCE MASON and CLIFTON MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wolfe v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Petitioner:
James A Wolfe
Respondent:
Seth F. Butner, Michelle A Henery, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffman v. Garza
as 4:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Tariq Hoffman
Respondent:
F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. Garza
as 1:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Sye Newton
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Garza
as 1:2023cv02057
Petitioner:
Clyde Jones
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOYE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURTS et al
as 2:2023cv01996
Petitioner:
NATHAN HOYE
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURTS, JUDGE SUSAN F. EVASHAVIK DILUCENTE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01483
Petitioner:
Derrick Houston
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
