Cases 51 - 60 of 180
Lang v. Bobby
as 5:2012cv02923
Petitioner:
Edward Lang
Respondent:
David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2012cv00312
Petitioner:
Antonio Sanchez Franklin
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00703
Petitioner:
Jerome Henderson
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landrum v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2012cv00859
Petitioner:
Lawrence Landrum
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Treesh v. Robinson
as 1:2012cv02322
Petitioner:
Frederick Treesh
Respondent:
Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Robinson
as 5:2012cv02323
Petitioner:
Ronald Phillips
Respondent:
Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2012cv00310
Petitioner:
Dennis B McGuire
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00699
Petitioner:
James Derrick O'Neal
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Awkal v. Morgan
as 1:2012cv01413
Petitioner:
Abdul Awkal
Respondent:
Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sheppard v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00198
Petitioner:
Bobby T. Sheppard
Defendant:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.