Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Mickey v. Ayers
as 07-99006
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS S MICKEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT L. AYERS, For California State Prison at San Quentin
Chatman v. Ayers
as 3:2007cv00640
Petitioner:
Erik Sanford Chatman
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Huggins v. Martel
as 4:2006cv07254
Petitioner:
Michael James Huggins
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Respondent:
Michael Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunkle v. Ayers
as 4:2006cv04115
Petitioner:
Jon Scott Dunkle
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers and Vincent Cullen
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clair v. Ayers
as 05-99005
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH CLAIR
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT L. AYERS, of California State Prison at San Quentin
Cooper v. Brown
as 05-99004
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JILL BROWN, California State Prison at San Quentin
Pollock v. Martel
as 3:2005cv01870
Petitioner:
Milton Ray Pollock
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr. and Michael Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Brown
as 05-99001
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS FRANCIS EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
JILL BROWN, of the California State Prison at San Quentin
Jackson v. Brown
as 04-99006
Petitioner - Appellee:
EARL LLOYD JACKSON
Respondent - Appellant:
JILL BROWN, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Pinholster v. Ayers
as 03-99003
Petitioner - Appellee:
SCOTT LYNN PINHOLSTER
Respondent - Appellant:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, of the California State Prison at San Quentin and ROBERT L. AYERS, Jr., Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
