Cases 61 - 70 of 151
Sales v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00256
Petitioner:
Tarus Vandell Sales
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lester Bower v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70003
Petitioner - Appellant:
LESTER LEROY BOWER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Freeman v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70001
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GARRETT FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jackson v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00208
Petitioner:
Christopher Devon Jackson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gobert v. Stephens
as 1:2015cv00042
Petitioner:
Milton Dwayne Gobert
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Brad Livingston and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv05112
Petitioner:
Wesley Lynn Ruiz
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Max Soffar v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70040
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAX ALEXANDER SOFFAR
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Louis Perez v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70039
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS CASTRO PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Slater v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv03576
Petitioner:
Paul Wayne Slater
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juan Castillo v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70038
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN CASTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
