Cases 71 - 80 of 86
CRISPELL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
DANIEL CRISPELL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFF MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2011cv04681
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEHIGH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv04550
Petitioner:
RONALD GIBSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , JEFF MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BIRDSONG v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv04240
Petitioner:
RALPH BIRDSONG
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
FLOR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03225
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTHONY FLOR
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. MARTIN, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MITCHELL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv02063
Petitioner:
ISAAC MITCHELL, SR.
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS B. FOLINO, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
LAIRD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv01916
Petitioner:
RICHARD ROLAND LAIRD
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
DENNIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv01660
Petitioner:
JAMES A. DENNIS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOND v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv01475
Petitioner:
AQUIL BOND
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAUMHAMMERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv00258
Petitioner:
RICHARD BAUMHAMMERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
