Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hall v. Ramirez
as 1:2018cv00218
Petitioner:
Erick Virgil Hall
Respondent:
Al Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruben Ramirez v. Steve McCraw, et al
as 17-70028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN CARDENAS RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE MCCRAW, Director, Texas Department of Public Safety, RICARDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., District Attorney, Hidalgo County, JOE MARCHAN, Regional Crime Lab Manager, Weslaco DPS Laboratory and others
Abdullah v. Ramirez
as 1:2017cv00098
Petitioner:
Azad Haji Abdullah
Respondent:
Al Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Ramirez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70005
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOHN H. RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellant:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ruben Cardenas v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70025
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ruben Ramirez Cardenas
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ruben Cardenas v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70025
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUBEN RAMIREZ CARDENAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Ramirez v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70020
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN H. RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Al Ramirez
as 13-35443
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD ROSS PIZZUTO, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
AL RAMIREZ, Warden of Idaho Maximum Security Institute
Ramirez v. Stephens
as 2:2012cv00410
Petitioner:
John H Ramirez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Ramirez v. Charles Ryan
as 10-99023
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID MARTINEZ RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES RYAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.