Cases 1 - 10 of 38
JOHNSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv04401
Petitioner:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv04402
Petitioner:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIVERA v. BEARD et al
as 5:2010cv04349
Petitioner:
CLETUS RIVERA
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
HAIRSTON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv01119
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD , LOUIS S. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Petitioner:
KENNETH HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv03469
Petitioner:
DENNIS MILLER
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD , LOUIS B. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDIVNER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv00866
Petitioner:
JAMES W. VANDIVNER, JR.
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLETCHER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv03188
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLETCHER
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS B. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COX v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv02673
Petitioner:
JERMONT COX
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sherwood v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv01073
Petitioner:
Brentt M. Sherwood
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard, Louis S. Folino, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dick v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv00988
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Dick
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard, Louis S. Folino, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
