Cases 51 - 60 of 18,778
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024bk90214
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024bk90226
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024bk90227
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024bk90346
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024bk90373
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024bk90243
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kauffman #360639 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08083
Petitioner:
Zion Z Kauffman and Luke Zion Yochai-Adams-Trimmer
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Union LLC v. ASR Group International Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperating, ASR Group International Incorporated, American Sugar Refining Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Union LLC an Arizona limited liability company, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Union Hospitality Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bullard #093272 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Jason Corey Bullard
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALKALINE WATER HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. WEAR et al
as 2:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
ALKALINE WATER HOLDINGS, LLC, KEYSTONE WATER HOLDINGS, LLC and H20 STATION HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
RYAN WEAR, CREATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, WATER STATION MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
