Cases 91 - 100 of 328
Rolon v. Migliori et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
John & Jane Does A-Z, Kevin G. Shea, Grant W. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Rolon and Antonio V. Rolon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sivak v. Doe
as 1:2019cv00234
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Siegert et al
as 1:2019cv00223
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10, Rona Siegert and J. Dolan
Plaintiff:
Steve Allan Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byerly v. Governor et al
as 1:2019cv00230
Defendant:
Mark Worthington, Idaho Department of Correction, John Doe Governor and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Morgan et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Plaintiff:
Romelio Alvin Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe, Jason R. Chandler and Stephanie Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
R Winter, Campbell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus George Ayala and Gregory Joseph Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbert v. Field et al
as 1:2018cv00470
Defendant:
Cindy Wilson, Debbie Field, Aaron Hofer and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Halbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Office of the Governor, State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Dennis James, Peace Officer's Standard and Training Council, Idaho, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Ada County, Cassia County, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant:
Darcy Bervik, Chad Sombke, Black and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
