Cases 91 - 100 of 475
Perry v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 5:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Rayford F Perry
Defendant:
Pamela Kirkpatrick, Tennie Griffin, Wesley Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irwin v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
Darrell Irwin
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Frederick v. State of Texas, TDCJ-CID, et al
as 09-20597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE FREDERICK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CID, NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, VERNON PITTMAN and others
Mitchell v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2009cv00404
Plaintiff:
Gene A Mitchell
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Debbie Ruthven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jacob Castillo
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Jackie Selwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv02866
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Garner
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01525
Petitioner:
Steven Renard Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baggett v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00799
Plaintiff:
Joshua Baggett
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Jackie Selwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Livingston et al
as 3:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel Quarterman, Larry LeFlore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sonnier v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00771
Plaintiff:
Corey D Sonnier
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
